63.6 F
Mobile
47.8 F
Huntsville
50.6 F
Birmingham
47.4 F
Montgomery

Steve Marshall fights court mandate forcing employers to pay for sex-change surgeries

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall is taking on another attempt by the courts to enforce pro-transgender ideology on businesses in the U.S.

Marshall filed an amicus brief with the full Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals asking the court to overturn a district court’s decision that would require employers offering healthcare coverage to their employees to pay for an employee’s sex-change operation or face liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

“The question for the Eleventh Circuit is whether an employer’s health insurance plan must pay for a male employee’s sex-change surgery simply because the plan pays for a mother to receive reconstructive surgery following childbirth,” Marshall said. “To state the obvious: the two treatments are not the same, and it is not unlawful discrimination to treat the two procedures differently.”

In the case, Lange v. Houston County, Georgia, an employee sought a sex-change operation to transition from male to female. When told that the employer’s insurance provider would not pay for the operation, the employee sued under Title VII, which prohibits discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

RELATED: Court mandate on employers covering sex-change operations challenged by Alabama AG Steve Marshall

The Eleventh Circuit by a 2-1 decision found that the employer could be held liable for violating Title VII by not paying for the operation.

Responding to the decision, Marshall, on behalf of 23 states, urged the court to convene en banc so all 12 active judges could rehear the case. The Eleventh Circuit granted that request, vacated the panel opinion, and will hear oral argument in February.

“The states within the Eleventh Circuit—Alabama, Florida, and Georgia—are steadfast in our opposition to the district court’s rewrite of Title VII, which would have negative consequences for employers by imposing greater liability and reduced clarity on how far the law extends,” Marshall said. “We are confident that the full court will agree and overturn this irrational decision.”

Marshall has been leading the effort against wake he calls the Biden administration’s woke agenda. Earlier this year he also filed a preliminary injunction against Biden’s changes to Title IX. He also filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year in support of Tennessee and Kentucky laws that will protect children from experimental gender transitional treatments.

Yaffee is a contributing writer to Yellowhammer News and hosts “The Yaffee Program” weekdays 9-11 a.m. on WVNN. You can follow him on Twitter @Yaffee

Don’t miss out!  Subscribe today to have Alabama’s leading headlines delivered to your inbox.