81 F
Mobile
73 F
Huntsville
79.1 F
Birmingham
57 F
Montgomery

Those who support abortion on demand cannot allow Marshae Jones to be held accountable

For the media and their Democrats, abortion is the Holy Grail — it must be defended at all cost.

No matter how ridiculous or unpopular the position, it must be treated as if it is completely reasonable.

Abortion after 13 weeks? Fine.

Abortion after 22 weeks? Fine.

Abortion after viability? Fine.

Abortion after and up until birth? Fine.

As if that wasn’t ghoulish enough, the case involving a shooting in Jefferson County that resulted in the death of a five-month-old fetus is the latest battleground for abortion rights.

A grand jury met and decided to charge the mother of the fetus in this case. That same jury chose not to charge the shooter as she was acting in self-defense.

Now, the media is advocating for the mother and tying the story to Alabama’s recent abortion ban.

From CNN:

“The investigation showed that the only true victim in this was the unborn baby,” Reid said.
But that characterization incensed critics who say Alabama keeps prioritizing fetuses over women.

It has nothing to do with that ban, but they cannot help themselves.

Alabama’s own AL.com has been notoriously on the side of women who harm their own children for years.

They are doing it here as well.

Why? It doesn’t involve abortion, but it does involve acknowledgment that a fetus that far along is a viable living thing.

Accepting that fact would destroy their entire worldview and give those who despise abortion on demand ammunition for their fight.

For that reason, fetuses harmed by their mother and their actions must be ignored and dismissed.

Dale Jackson is a contributing writer to Yellowhammer News and hosts a talk show from 7-11 am weekdays on WVNN.

Don’t miss out!  Subscribe today to have Alabama’s leading headlines delivered to your inbox.