The battle between the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and former Alabama Crimson Tide defensive coordinator as well as Tennessee Volunteers head coach Jeremy Pruitt has been raging for years, but it’s coming to a head over the last couple months.

Earlier this season, news emerged that the Jacksonville State Gamecocks were attempting to hire Pruitt in an analyst role, something which was complicated by an NCAA show cause penalty going back to a recruiting scandal which ended his time in Knoxville.

Pruitt — who had been working with his father as a high school coach at Plainview High School in Rainsville — was granted the special approval and looked set to return.

A judge in DeKalb County ruled in his favor for an ongoing $100 million lawsuit of the organization, which resulted in a preliminary injunction against the NCAA, preventing them from enforcing the show cause.

Because Pruitt’s role at JSU was secured with the show cause being enforced, he is prevented from recruiting duties and in-game activity.

The injunction, however, appeared to make this a non-factor. But now the NCAA is pushing back.

Mike Rodak of 247Sports shed some light on the situation and into the NCAA’s argument, which largely revolves around the impact on the organization being able to enforce penalties at all.

“The NCAA wants the Alabama Supreme Court to consider whether the DeKalb County court had jurisdiction over the NCAA to issue the injunction, whether the court was the proper venue for the case, whether the trial court ‘ignored well-settled principles against interfering with or second-guessing the internal affairs and decisions of athletic associations,’ and whether Pruitt’s situation met the criteria for an injunction to be issued,” Rodak wrote.

Moving forward, this is a situation worth monitoring not just because of Pruitt, but every program and coach who has found themselves in hot water for recruiting related violations.