64.6 F
Mobile
55.7 F
Huntsville
60.5 F
Birmingham
46 F
Montgomery

Alabama joins lawsuit challenging Obama’s executive actions on immigration

wooden gavel and books on wooden table,on brown background

MONTGOMERY, Ala. — Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange on Wednesday joined a lawsuit filed by the State of Texas challenging the President’s recent immigration actions as unconstitutional and illegal. On Nov. 20, President Obama issued a Department of Homeland Security directive that unilaterally suspended immigration laws as applied to millions of illegal immigrants in the United States.

In the complaint, Strange and other state attorneys general assert that the president’s executive order violates America’s founding principle of the rule of law.

“This lawsuit is not about immigration. It is about the rule of law, presidential power, and the enforcement of the U.S. Constitution,” the complaint reads. “By his own action and contrary to laws passed by Congress, the President issued a directive that legalizes the presence of approximately 40% of the known undocumented immigrant population, and affords them legal rights and benefits…That unilateral suspension of the Nation’s immigration laws is unlawful.”

The complaint also notes that the President failed in his attempts to persuade Congress to change the law, and that he admitted numerous times throughout that process that he did not have authority to act on his own. The suit quotes the President conceding that his office was not empowered to circumvent Congress.

Direct quotes made by President Obama that are included in the complaint are as follows:

1. “There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply through executive order ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President,”

2. “[I]f this was an issue that I could do unilaterally I would have done it a long time ago…The way our system works is Congress has to pass legislation,”

3. “We have certain obligations to enforce the laws that are in place…[W]e’ve kind of stretched our administrative flexibility as much as we can… But if we start broadening that, then essentially I would be ignoring the law in a way that I think would be very difficult to defend legally.”

In a statement released Wednesday, Strange criticized Obama for not upholding his oath of office.

“The President is obligated by the United States Constitution to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed’—to uphold and enforce the laws passed by Congress,” he said. “Instead, he has claimed a prosecutorial discretion that simply does not exist, as an excuse to change the law himself to achieve what he wanted that has failed to gain Congressional approval. He made dramatic changes that extend legal benefits to people who are openly violating the law, without so much as the notice and opportunity for comment that is required for changes in the federal rulemaking process. These actions are unconstitutional and illegal, and will severely impact the States with increased costs for law enforcement, health care and education.”

The lawsuit, Texas v. U.S., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Texas was joined by the States of Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, West Virginia, Utah and Wisconsin; and the Governors of Idaho, Maine, Mississippi and North Carolina.


Don’t miss out!  Subscribe today to have Alabama’s leading headlines delivered to your inbox.